Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 01/22/2012 08:00 AM, Mark Woodward wrote: > In some ways we are to blame. We software engineers have not taken our > profession seriously. We have not created and/or joined the > professional organizations, like doctors, lawyers, electricians, and > pipe-fitters, to define and protect our profession. I would agree to some extent. There was an organization many years ago that attempted this, but never made any headway. While certainly doctors need to be licensed to practice, lawyers, electricians, and others do not need a license if they work inside a company. But if they are employed to where they use their profession to provide a service they need to be licensed. When you hire a law firm, you expect that the lawyers you deal with are fully licensed and have passed the bar. > > What has happened, sadly, is that we have a profession in which there > are no standards and any newbe can come along create a new programming > language because he or she did not like the existing language. If we > are lucky, it looks something like previous languages, but this is not > always the case. We don't steadily improve the tools of our craft, we > destroy them and rebuild them new each and every time. Agreed to some extent. > > How many programming languages and environments are needed? How many > operating systems? If you look at electricians, they have a whole set > of regulations about wire, connectors, methodologies, etc. Do we? > Hell, if we compared ourselves to plumbers, we would re-invent the > pipe for each job. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |