Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/05/2012 03:13 PM, MBR wrote: > On 5/4/2012 7:13 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: >> Versioning isn't revision control. Revision control isn't versioning. >> There is some overlap in what they do but they aren't the same thing. >> --Rich P. > That's becoming clear. I'm trying to understand the difference. It > seems like versioning is having the operating system do for all files > what emacs does for text files. Is it that versioning automatically > provides me with some number of backup copies of the file that I can go > back to in case I screw something up, as long as I don't mistakenly > delete the whole file. And that's contrasted with revision control > which is not automatic. It requires a conscious decision to save a > version, but can track file deletion and renaming, and knows about sets > of file revisions that produce a working system. Do I have that right? In the context of software development, it is much more important to have a snapshot of ALL FILES at any point in time than one particular file, since they depend on each other so heavily. Versioning filesystems won't do that.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |