Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Versioning File Systems



On 05/05/2012 03:13 PM, MBR wrote:
> On 5/4/2012 7:13 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
>> Versioning isn't revision control. Revision control isn't versioning.
>> There is some overlap in what they do but they aren't the same thing.
>> --Rich P. 
> That's becoming clear.  I'm trying to understand the difference.  It
> seems like versioning is having the operating system do for all files
> what emacs does for text files.  Is it that versioning automatically
> provides me with some number of backup copies of the file that I can go
> back to in case I screw something up, as long as I don't mistakenly
> delete the whole file.  And that's contrasted with revision control
> which is not automatic.  It requires a conscious decision to save a
> version, but can track file deletion and renaming, and knows about sets
> of file revisions that produce a working system.  Do I have that right?

In the context of software development, it is much more important to
have a snapshot of ALL FILES at any point in time than one particular
file, since they depend on each other so heavily.  Versioning
filesystems won't do that.




Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org