![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/07/2012 02:52 PM, Tom Metro wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> Mostly is seems this is coming down to the issue of whether you can >> patent an API - the names of classes, methods, and their arguments. > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/05/jury-rules-google-violated-copyright-law-google-moves-for-mistrial.ars > > ...a San Francisco jury issued a verdict today that the company broke > copyright laws when it used Java APIs to design the system. ... But > the jury couldn't reach agreement on a second critical issue--whether > Google had a valid "fair use" defense when it used the APIs. Google > has asked for a mistrial based on the incomplete verdict, and that > issue will be briefed later this week. They also just transitioned into the patent phase. There is a big issue on allowing Jonathan Shwartz to testify. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |