![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
"Derek Atkins" <derek at ihtfp.com> writes: > In either case it is most likely a postfix configuration issue, but I'm at > a loss for how to fix it. I added [fe80::]/10 to mynetworks, but I > haven't been able to figure out how to get it to output more debugging to > tell me exactly which rules are affecting the mail. fe80:: addresses are lacking meaning without a scope indicator. Try [fe80::%eth0]/10 for mynetworks, rather than what you did. That it even let you say that is probably a bug. Scoped addressing is a corner case, with all of the bugs that come with it. Are you sure you wouldn't rather be using a relatively debugged scopeless address?
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |