![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > ...that's why things like ZFS and BTRFS implement OS-level > checksumming of filesystems... > > USB flash drives don't all have FEC or any error correction at all. I have > actually experienced enough bit errors from USB fobs, that I simply don't > use them for anything anymore. If I need usb storage, I use a hard drive or > nothing. Why not use an error correcting file system on them? >> Does it make sense to have a >> raid setup for redundancy? Or just trust the drives will work fine? > > If you would use redundant HDD's in the same situation, then use redudnant > SSD's. You choose the redundancy level of your storage purely by the value > of your data... "Value of your data" is a little misleading, as "RAID is not backup." The more accurate statements is "value of your data availability." -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |