![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:00:27PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > On mac & windows, I'm accustomed to Time Machine and Acronis. Key features > are: > . Run in the background, low priority, no complaints from user about > performance. > . Daily (or more frequent) incrementals > . Able to specify excludes > . Able to restore whole system, or just a few individual files > . User doesn't need IT assistance to restore a few individual files > > I'm willing to compromise on the last two points, and *maybe* even > compromise on the excludes. But there can be no compromise on the first two > points. > > I'm trying to find a suitable, similar backup solution for linux (ubuntu > desktop in particular). Up till now, the best I've done is dump (ext4 > filesystem.) Unfortunately, even when I nice dump to the fullest extent, > it's still too resource intensive. Users complain tremendously, as long as > it's running. rsnapshot with a --bw-limit adjusted to take up less than half of a user's disk IO will satisfy 1,2,3 and 5. It's not great at whole-system restoration, although it can be done in combination with a rescue disk. It excels at "no IT assistance needed" partial restores. -dsr-
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |