Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 7/14/2012 5:35 PM, Tom Metro wrote: > It would be interesting to get an expert's opinion on this, backed up > with some long term statistics, to see if drive reliability, at the > higher capacities, is in fact trailing off. I mentioned this a few months back: the most reliable drives that BackBlaze has seen are the same ones that NewEgg customers have given some of the lowest reliability ratings. BackBlaze has tens of thousands of this particular model and they hardly ever have problems, yet the NewEgg scores for this drive are quite low. Which tells me something I already knew: Customer reviews are cumulatively skewed towards failures. You hear about a few dozen failures but you don't hear about the hundreds of thousands that don't fail. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |