Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Oracle killing Red Hat makes even less sense than Oracle buying Red Hat. Seriously, what would Larry Ellison gain from it? Nothing. He already has a software stack. He already has RHEL with the trademarks rasped away. A strong Red Hat makes for a strong Oracle Linux. Weakening Red Hat means a weaker RHEL to molest with a rasp, and killing Red Hat means no RHEL at all. I'm sure that Oracle would recovery from killing Red Hat but why bother? Rolling out a complete enterprise distribution is expensive. Rasps are cheap. I remind you of something that Mark wrote earlier: that CentOS is the defacto free version of RHEL. This makes Red Hat dependent on the CentOS project for getting the foot in the door. What happens if Oracle Linux displaces CentOS as that freebie RHEL? I figure this is what Ellison wants. He's not out to kill Red Hat. He's out to make Oracle a necessity for Red Hat's continued operation. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |