Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
John Abreau wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> ...it doesn't seem right that some outside force (an >> FTC lawsuit, for example) should compel Microsoft... > > Let's apply this logic to other areas of commerce: > > [I]t doesn't seem right that some outside force (a government food safety > inspector, for example) should compel a restaurant to include in its > "Food Preparation Requirements" that ingredients are handled in a manner > that ensures they won't serve food-borne pathogens to their customers. I don't see the relevance in the comparison. The example you site is a matter of public safety and presumably the FDA would be operating within its authority granted by law. In the case of Microsoft and Secure Boot, the situation would need to pass some thresholds of anti-competitive behavior to be in violation of the law, and enforceable by FTC action. That's what I am doubting. Not that a government agency can or should regulate commerce in general. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |