Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Quite awhile ago I set up Linux clients on a Linux host, and looking for greater disk performance I gave the clients disk partitions directly. I do not know if it made things faster, but I do know that it makes things a pain in general. File systems are nice, they offer lots of features. Unless one gets very bleeding edge and starts to break the virtual- model (and heading para-virtual, a la Xen), I think one is stuck with double data copies for IO from VMs to disk. But at least on a Linux host, I think the result can be very efficient. Google for suggestions of what host file system to choose these days, etc. (Disks and CPUs are getting dang fast these days, so double copies aren't so bad, but for if you really need performance, run on real hardware.) And I would recommend a Linux host, and I think there are good technical reasons for that, but this is also a Unix/Linux mailing list, so one should expect us to say so. I have been pretty happy with my Linux hosting Linux home server. It is getting very long in the tooth and needs replacing, and I was only doing software Qemu, but it does work pretty well. I climbed out on an early limb, but it worked. -kb
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |