Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 08/04/2012 12:54:50 PM, Guy Gold wrote: > Xen is no longer the 'hypervisor of choice' for most Linux Disotros Xen is an odd beast. I played with it once and I didn't like the tight coupling between the guest and host (upgrade host kernel and guest doesn't boot I think happened to me), but there is a reason for that. It is a para-virtualization thingie. It is more complicated to manage but it can run more guests in less hardware, and I think it can do some IO more efficiently; I think it can get rid of some double copies by letting the guest hit the hardware more directly, and this requires the tighter integration between guest and host. I have a Linux "box" on Linode, it seems to work well at a reasonable price, and I think they do it via Xen. In general I think you want to stay away from setting up a Xen environment unless you have good reason to go there. The pure VM of KVM or Virtualbox is more likely what one wants. -kb
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |