Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:55:37PM -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > Hopefully this will provide some clues. Note that I currently have > the server set up as one to one nat. I've tried a bunch of other > configurations but this one appears to function as desired. The > server has ufw enabled to allow port 80. If it functions as desired, then what is the problem? You've been told by multiple people that one-to-one NAT is not going to work correctly.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |