Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:17:07 -0500 Tom Metro <tmetro+blu at gmail.com> wrote: > What relevance is that? What are the practical differences that are a > result of the bolt-on alternatives? Tablets are devices of convenience. Bolt-on accessories are the opposite of convenience. Bolt-ons add weight and bulk. They're in the way when they are not needed and they're not where they need to be when they are needed. > Also, Samsung has their line of Note phones and tablets which use a > stylus, and supposedly higher resolution digitizer. I bet it has hand > writing recognition. It does, sort of. It's not integrated with the system so it ends up being inconsistent across applications. That's... bad design. Regarding gestural input: it's not just a matter of putting in enough cameras. It has to be one-handed and it has to work in the limited space between handset and eyes. These are not insurmountable problems. My belief is that the handset OEMs aren't going to spend money and time trying to overcome them. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |