Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Mark Woodward wrote: > >>It strikes me as absurd to claim that a system that fails to protect > >>freedom is somehow "more free". There's an assumption here that is wrong. The job of a software license is to protect the rights of the copyright holder while granting privileges to their business associates. It is NOT to protect the freedoms of the software's users. If you distribute software under BSD-style license, you're explicitly stating that you don't mind if people take your software and make it non-free. This does not harm the freedom of the original software in any way, and the author of the new software should have the freedom to choose whether to make his software free or not, so long as the upstream doesn't prevent him from doing so. > >I think you're hinting that CDDL fails to protect freedom. Please > >elaborate, but begin by reading the CDDL. > > The problem with the CDDL is that it allows you to combine CDDL > licensed software with non-CDDL licensed software to create a > "larger work" which is not CDDL where only the CDDL portions are > protected. This is not a problem. As the copyright holder, I have the right to make my software non-free. And that remains true even if I've used someone else's software as the basis of my own, SO LONG AS THEY GAVE ME PERMISSION TO DO SO. > This will do nothing to prevent the MIT kerberos problem. Neither would the GPL, for reasons I already gave you. > The freedom to deny freedom is NOT a freedom. Yes it is. It's the freedom to control your work product, which an author ABSOLUTELY MUST HAVE. > By combining the FREE software with NON-FREE software you can create > NON-FREE software. This does not protect FREE software. Why should it? The copyright holder doesn't want it free. The original author doesn't care if derivative works are free. What right do YOU have to INSIST that it be free? Why, none at all, in fact. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |