Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> Media boundaries, as well as file boundaries, are meaningless. In fact, they > are one and the same. Gawd, I can't believe there's still MORE to say about this. Beating a dead horse, about the total complete insignificance of file and media boundaries. Now how about if I store something in Amazon S3. They don't provide a filesystem; just an abstracted serial data store accessible through an API. So if I write a GPL binary there, and follow it with a non-GPL binary, I haven't combined them into a file. If I tell you to download blocks A, I've only distributed the GPL product, not the other product. If I tell you to download blocks B, I've only distributed the other product, not the GPL product. But if I tell you to download blocks A and B, then have I combined those things into a single derived work? What if I merely tell you, "Block A is the GPL product, and Block B is the non-GPL product." And I leave the decision up to you, to choose if you're going to download neither, one or the other, or both. What if I tell you, "The URL for a GPL product is ___ and the URL for a non-GPL product is ____"
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |