Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

> From: John Abreau [mailto:abreauj at]
> Another silly claim. The FSF cannot sue Joe on behalf of the?copyright holder.
> The FSF can only sue if the copyright was assigned to the FSF.
> The FSF would not be?entitled to sue Joe?Schmoe unless?Joe?Schmoe violated
> the license on something for which the FSF held the copyright.

busybox is not copyrighted to the FSF.  Its individual files are copyrighted to a zillion different individuals.

But it looks like I did make one mistake:  It wasn't the FSF, it was the SFLC, Software Freedom Law Center, who filed lawsuit on behalf of two guys, who contributed to busybox development.  But the people who originated busybox were not represented, nor benefitted from the settlements.

So it seems, if you want to sue somebody on behalf of somebody else's open source software, you just need contribute to it (or fork it and then contribute to it), and find some way that a recipient was in violation of the license terms.

BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

Boston Linux & Unix /