Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan

Subject: [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
From: jack at coats.org (Jack Coats)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:29:55 -0600
In-reply-to: <51254B1D.4050503@blu.org>
References: <99fba8fb525831c5781b02192f53e077.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <51254B1D.4050503@blu.org>

I have setup backuppc before.  It works pretty well, and if you use
their dedupe software,
It is basically rsync with a reasonable interface.  Not as easy to
deal with as crashplan, but not bad.

Check out the software here.

             http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

References:
- [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
  - From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
Next by Date: [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
Previous by thread: [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
Next by thread: [Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org