[Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On 02/21/2013 03:28 PM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:57:07 -0500
> Tom Metro <tmetro+blu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, at least as far back as NT 4.0 (I used them via 3rd party tools),
>> but as far as I know they've never been supported by the Windows GUI,
> Depends on what you mean by "supported". Both GUI and CLI APIs follow
> hard links and junctions just fine.
>
> Explorer does not have a fuction for creating links and junctions which
> is probably just as well. It would lead to inconsistent behavior
> between NTFS and FAT file systems.
>
> In Windows 7, maybe Vista as well, there is a MKLINK command which is
> the functional equivalent to the Unix ln command.
>
>> and I find it quite plausible that rsync doesn't support links on
>> NTFS, even though it could.
> rsync does support hard and soft links on NTFS when compiled with
> Cygwin. I'm not sure about rsync compiled with MinGW; I don't use that.
>
>
>> You get similar weird behavior if you try and use hard links on NTFS.)
> That's due to sloppy programming in the application.
>
AFAIK the Windows mklink command creates a symbolic link not a hard
link. This is a big difference.

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:3BC1EB90 
PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66  C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90