[Discuss] On-site backups revisited - rsnapshot vs. CrashPlan

[warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)]

Jack Coats <jack at coats.org> writes:

> http://blog.backblaze.com/2013/02/20/180tb-of-good-vibrations-storage-pod-3-0/
>
> A little off topic, but these guys have come out with 3.0 of their
> 'big NAS server' build.
> Storage upgrade is mainly 3T to 4T drives (45 of them), but they do have other
> refinements and learnings that have come along with this upgrade they
> share in the blog post.
>
> Worth the read for the uber-geeky.

My understanding is that their requirements are for large-scale,
write-once, read-rarely storage.  I don't think their devices are tuned
for high performance read-write operations that you would want from,
e.g., a media server.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available