BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Storage question follow-up

Subject: [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:35:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1302221608210.12881@nber6>
References: <CAL5zbj_mx7GG+rZNd4JhGEPSwLqjg9Lh3fG5fC-NiR4-2haq+g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=qD0NE-MVbAE-+0DjT1ha8jyPyXcYxic+tFepDnAw+Tfg@mail.gmail.com> <20130222180851.GN2574@randomstring.org> <CAJFsZ=rSSpYeHcRUewit_fOzJHySCxkfusV0BW9To0J5ACn9Cw@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1302221608210.12881@nber6>

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:13:49 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Feenberg <feenberg at nber.org> wrote:

> A very nice treatment of the pros and cons of the backblaze pod
> is given by the Bioteam at

Good read, especially the "why not to build a backblaze" article. It
does a nice job of cutting through the buzzwords to describe precisely
what a backblaze pod isn't.

-- 
Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
  - From: pjalajas at tebuco.com (Peter Jalajas)
- [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
  - From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
  - From: feenberg at nber.org (Daniel Feenberg)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
Next by Date: [Discuss] IPv6 Hardware
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
Next by thread: [Discuss] Storage question follow-up
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org