Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:53:28AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Dan Ritter <dsr at randomstring.org> writes: > > >> mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd > >> > >> It this going to be more like raid10? > > > > No, that's still RAID1: two copies of every file, no striping. > > If you want striping+mirroring, turn on -d RAID10. > > How is it still raid1? Maybe my definitions and your definitions are > different here. Let's say that each device is 1TB. If I have 2, then > obiously I only have 1TB of storage because each extent is duplicated on > both drives. However if I have 4 drives, you imply I get 2TB of storage > (because still, each extent is mirrored on two drives). But what I > don't understand is how is this not effectively "raid 10"? You're > combining storage from multiple drives into a single filesystem larger > than the mirrored drives. linear is concatenation: after you fill the first disk, fill the second... raid 0 is striping: split the data and write parts to all disks at once. the n>2 raid1 is essentially mirror + linear. raid10 is mirror + striping. -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |