![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:51:10 -0600 Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > It's very different. With a FAT filesystem, the OS gives you the > option to specify the UID/GUID to mount with, so YOU DO NOT NEED TO > MAKE THE FILES WORLD READABLE/WRITABLE. AFAIK you can't do that with > any other writable filesystem. As a matter of fact, many of the file systems supported by Linux have options for uid and gid mapping. It's the ones commonly used for live systems which don't. At the end of the day, if you want to maximize portability then use FAT and live with the big allocation units. Or do something to ensure that UIDs and GIDs are themselves portable across hosts. -- Rich P.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |