![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:41:32 -0400 Bill Horne <bill at horne.net> wrote: > The groups doesn't have any money, so any solution has to be > open-source. Please suggest some Document Management Systems that > qualify, and tell us why you recommend them. There are open source document management systems out there. A lot of them. I'm familiar with only a few and they have very specialized niches. I won't recommend any of them. Two reasons. One, none of them fit your users' needs. If they did then your users would already be using one of them or they'd be demanding one of them. Two, you don't have a document management strategy. Someone in the organization said, "let's throw a wiki at it". That's not a strategy; it's a disaster. You need to address this before you make any decisions. Ask Google about document management. Peruse the capabilities of the various offerings. Take note of systems that are used by organizations similar to yours. I say this because a DMS designed for use by a small, government-sponsored scientific research laboratory will be unsuitable for use by a bank. When it comes time to sell it to the organization you should stress the key differences between wikis and DMS. Wikis are made for rapid collaboration and note-taking. They're very good at managing many small, quick edits to mostly simple text. Document management systems are made for storing, indexing, searching and retrieving complete documents. This includes but is not limited to anything you might create in your favorite office suite such as spreadsheets, product documentation, presentations, and so forth. -- Rich P.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |