Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
To elaborate on this: Given three disks: A, B and C, each 500G in a three-disk raid 1 configuration. If you write a 100G file that file is written to disks A and B. None of the file data is written to C. If you then write a 50G file then the file data will be written to disks C and A. None of the file data is written to disk B. At this point, disk A has 150G used, Disk B has 100G used and disk C has 50G used. The largest file that you can write is 350G, limited by the available capacity on disk A. In a three disk RAID 1e configuration, the 100G file will have file data spread across all three disks. Likewise the 50G file. The largest file that you can write is 600g: (1500G/2)-150G because data blocks are striped across all three disks in the set. RAID 1e is marketing gobbledygook. The spiel goes something like this: if you have N disks and you lose up to (N/2)-1 (or something like that) then you might not lose your data. RAID is not about data integrity or preventing data loss. RAID is about no single point of failure. That is, a single failure will not knock you out. If you are concerned about two or more failures then you should be looking at nested RAID such as RAID 100 or RAID 50. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |