BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment

Subject: [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
From: hag at linnaean.org (Daniel Hagerty)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:35:39 -0400
In-reply-to: <51914888.4050101@gmail.com> (Tom Metro's message of "Mon, 13 May 2013 16:09:44 -0400")
References: <518DE9BA.80100@gmail.com> <20130511184115.GU26546@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <519014C5.80302@gmail.com> <c2ivc6m7lgk.fsf@perdition.linnaean.org> <51914888.4050101@gmail.com>

Tom Metro <tmetro+blu at gmail.com> writes:

> Ah, perfect, those sides from Comcast's IPv6 Architect explains how the
> move to IPv6 was driven by their internal needs...

    I'll bet you'll find a lot of the glossed over bits in the slides
expanded on in the audio recording:

http://www.nanog.org/meeting-archives/nanog37/presentations/100million.ram

In general, nanog talks have been really good ever the years for
capturing details like this.  I haven't listened to this one.

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
  - From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)

References:
- [Discuss] Geoff Huston's talk at NANOG53
  - From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Geoff Huston's talk at NANOG53
  - From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
- [Discuss] Geoff Huston's talk at NANOG53
  - From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Geoff Huston's talk at NANOG53
  - From: hag at linnaean.org (Daniel Hagerty)
- [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
  - From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
Next by Date: [Discuss] really odd GCC bug? under Ubuntu
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
Next by thread: [Discuss] Comcast's IPv6 deployment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org