Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:16:26PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > > NO, IT IS NOT. If the files were not there, he would STILL get a > > permission denied after chmod 0. This conforms exactly to what I > > said. > > Irrelevant. What Bill was expecting was "file not found" which GCC > passes over for optional include and library directories. What he got > was the unexpected "permission denied" error and GCC failing. It's not irrelevant because the very point was that the technical explanation you gave was wrong. And it was. You're a smart guy and your technical explanations are usually excellent, and people expect that from you. But sometimes you say stuff that's out of left field (which we all do), and you say it perfectly matter-of-factly, without leaving any room for uncertainty (as, from time to time, probably most of us do--I know I certainly have). So I think when you do, you should be called on it. This is a case of that. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |