Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/27/2013 11:11 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > I'm not a programmer. Never was, probably never will be. I'm a sysadmin. > Bourne is my go-to language for anything repetitive for two simple > reasons: it's there, and it doesn't change. Every UNIX and Unixalike has > Bourne shell. Every single one. And it works the same on all of them. A > Bourne script written for Ultrix 3 works on Solaris 9 and RHEL 6 with > maybe a slight tweak for different paths (SysV vs. BSD vs. LSB). > > No other scripting language in the world meets those criteria. > Agreed. But, there are some differences in some of the older versions. Ran into that when doing some scripting at the Digital multi-system lab where we had scripts for Bourne (Ultrix), Bourne (HP-UX) and Bourne Sun OS (before Solaris). But, modern versions of SH have a standard. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |