Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:32:29PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > Derek Martin wrote: > Tricks like that were necessary when wrangling some 20 different UNIXes. Right, but you're making my point. :) Python 2.6 is python 2.6, regardless of where it's installed. There's no need to memorize (or code) an entire library of portability issues. And for the most part, code you wrote for python 1.x still works with it; and when it does not, most often the language tells you what to do instead when you run the code (but backward compatibility is maintained for a very long time, with suitable warnings). As for internal syntax consistency and design, IMO none of the other languages I've used can beat it. That makes it unbelievably easy to learn, and possible to write useful code almost immediately. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |