Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Tom Metro wrote: > Far from a perfect solution, but its cheaper and a better user > experience than two-factor. It's X.509 PKI key exchange. SSL is built on top of an X.509 PKI. X.509 is far from perfect. Very far. X.509 was designed by committee. It shows in its fundamental weaknesses (such as reliance on the trust of third party certificate authorities) and implementation weaknesses (too numerous to list). Better systems exist. Hell, better systems existed before X.509 did. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |