Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Seems to be obvious to everyone but Richard. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> > wrote: > > John Abreau wrote: > >> > >> Nope, sorry, that's completely irrelevant to the subject of this thread. > >> To argue that FreeBSD desktops are better than Linux desktops, when you > >> really mean just the MacOSX desktop, is disingenuous at best . It serves > >> only to muddy the conversation and derail the conversation. > > > > > > Claiming that OS X isn't a Unix desktop is the disingenuous thing. > > Proprietary or no, it is a Unix desktop as much as NeXTStep (being the > > direct successor to NeXTStep) or the CDE or the IRIX Interactive Desktop. > > As far as I can tell, you are the first person to use the word "UNIX" > in this discussion thread so I'm not sure why you brought it up. > They are claiming that there is a difference between a FreeBSD and > MacOSX desktop, but that seems pretty obvious to me. > > Bill Bogstad > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |