Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 08/16/2013 11:36 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Kent, > > Critique and review of ciphers is not that simple. Compare RSA to RC4, > both developed in part or in total by Ron Rivest. On paper, RSA is a > weak algorithm while RC4 is a strong one. In practice, however, RC4 > was found to be weak through experimentation while RSA has withstood > attack. > > You need to know how to attack ciphers if you want to critique them. > And even that isn't always enough to spot weaknesses. > I't has been a while, but if I recall, Derek was on a team that cracked an RSA key. I don't remember the details,but I still remember Derek's talk. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |