Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] our friend the nsa



On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> >That is, can someone use the same toolchain Apple uses to
> >compile the same source and get the same binaries?
> >
> >And if so, has anyone done so?
> 
> Yes. It's called PureDarwin:
> http://www.puredarwin.org/


No, that proves that the source compiles legitimately. I want to
know if anyone has run diffs against the binaries that Apple
provides and the binaries generated from the Apple source to
determine whether Apple is actually using that source as-is.

Reflections on Trusting Trust, of course, but also the much
simpler "separate version for source code release removes our
special sauce".

-dsr-



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org