Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: > >That is, can someone use the same toolchain Apple uses to > >compile the same source and get the same binaries? > > > >And if so, has anyone done so? > > Yes. It's called PureDarwin: > http://www.puredarwin.org/ No, that proves that the source compiles legitimately. I want to know if anyone has run diffs against the binaries that Apple provides and the binaries generated from the Apple source to determine whether Apple is actually using that source as-is. Reflections on Trusting Trust, of course, but also the much simpler "separate version for source code release removes our special sauce". -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |