Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:16:32AM -0500, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > NFS is not as fast as a local disk, but it should not be that slow. As JABR points out, that's really a misconception. It depends a great deal on all the hardware involved. Now, these days, it's actually hard to buy a disk that won't give you more than 8MB/s sustained transfer rate (which is roughly what you could expect over 100Mb network). But Gigabit networks are common now, and if your NFS server is built for it (i.e. it isn't just yet another desktop with a single local disk) you should easily be able to far exceed the performance of a workstation's cheap local disk. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |