Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
'm not saying they are "dead" as in no one is using them, I'm more thinking they are dead with regard to feature development. PostgreSQL and MySQL and the commercial databases just seem less "important" these days with things like MongoDB and Cassandra. Don't get me wrong, I think the NoSQL crowd are fairly delusional because eventually these NoSQL databases will all have SQL front ends and ACID characteristics are vital to any real database. (but I digress) Traditional ACID SQL databases have more or less peaked. Data stores like the NoSQL ilk are pretty much done feature wise as well. Stonebreaker's next project is getting very little traction. Have databases become just another "word processor" like application where almost all the standard offerings are really good enough? I mean, jeez, tomcat, apache, php, etc. are all jus good enough and there are no new "must have" features as well. I guess the real question is what's left or are infrastructure components pretty much done?
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |