Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 12:00 -0500, Kent Borg wrote: > On 01/28/2014 11:54 AM, Kent Borg wrote: > > Write down most of it, remember a shorter portion of it. > > Effectively doing a poorman's two-factor security. Something you have > (the written part) and something you know (the remembered part). > > -kb > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > Thanks guys for this discussion on Linux encryption. My situation is that the government mandates that the system be encrypted, even though I'm not using it to store any information that needs encryption. This is more of a bureaucratic requirement than anything else. Be that said, this discussion has been very informative. As for the disk IO issue, I've migrated to using SSD's with fantastic performance improvement, thus the fear that I may see my snappy environment degrade to my hard drive IO speed response times when turning on encryption. It sounds like I don't have to worry about that. Thanks again BLU. Steve.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |