Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) <blu at nedharvey.com>wrote: > > From: greg.rundlett at gmail.com [mailto:greg.rundlett at gmail.com] On Behalf > > Of Greg Rundlett (freephile) > > > > invariably, you'll have some users > > who want to use an svn client that doesn't support > > svn+ssh. > > I've deployed more svn servers than I care to count. I am not aware of > any such featureless client. Can you provide an example? > There are some listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Subversion_clients Others like Madcap Flare (technical documentation) delegate the svn client piece so they can work with e.g. TortoiseSVN I'm not saying that svn+ssh is a bad choice. I'm saying that it can be more difficult to roll out and support because users don't understand it, or don't know how to configure their systems for it, or need additional software. With HTTP(s) access, you just have to provide users with the more familiar 1) website, 2) username, 3) password Greg Rundlett http://eQuality-Tech.com <http://equality-tech.com/> http://freephile.org
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |