Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
if "it's not exposed to the world" is known to be a true statement, then what is he concerned about? I will say that MediaWiki *is* very hard to lock down if that statement is not known to be true. Most wikis fall into one of two camps: "Information wants to be free and that's what wikis are for so why would you want to lock it down?" and "Today's internet is a scary place and even wikis need access control". There's not much in the middle. I LOVE Foswiki for many reasons, but very high on the list is that it has full user/group authorizations at the system level, the wiki level, and at the page level. On 01/31/2014 01:56 PM, Jeffrey Young wrote: > I want to implement a Media Wiki at work, but my boss is worried about > security risks. To me it seems simple, if it's not exposed to the world, > what's the problem? Am I missing something? > > Thanks, > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |