BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] protecting kids online
- Subject: [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:54:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <52F2BD63.6020302@gmail.com> (Richard Pieri's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:38:27 -0500")
- References: <52F26E29.9000906@gmail.com> <52F2A6AC.9060301@borg.org> <52F2BD63.6020302@gmail.com>
Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> writes: > Kent Borg wrote: >> But putting up content blocks seems the wrong first step, it sets her up >> as an opponent, doesn't it? > > Precisely. That's why I call these things half-assed. What happens > when a kid is told not to do something? What did you -- any of you -- > do when you were told, as a kid, not to do something? Chances are you > did it anyway, and chances are you did it because you were told not to > do it. So if you want to cultivate an interest in hacking linux routers, etc., a good first step would be to block porn? -- Mike Small smallm at panix.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: eric.chadbourne at gmail.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- References:
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: eric.chadbourne at gmail.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] protecting kids online
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] protecting kids online
- Next by Date: [Discuss] protecting kids online
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] protecting kids online
- Next by thread: [Discuss] protecting kids online
- Index(es):