BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:06:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: <dcea8cc1d839d570a0852a9776932385.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <dcea8cc1d839d570a0852a9776932385.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
On 03/31/2014 03:00 PM, Rich Braun wrote: > For me, the use-case for HA technology really isn't just about > designing around failure. The more-important thing for me as a > weekend-hobbyist user is being able to take something down, mess with > it/upgrade it/overhaul it for a few hours or days, and put it back > online without disrupting anything else. And my description of paired servers with sw raid 1 and DRBD and dual /-partitions and KVM live migration...is a way to fire up "a new computer" by building a VM, and a whim, but not have all my eggs in one hardware basket. Getting the aforementioned setup to work as smoothly as all that...I have not yet done. But I am putting together a shopping list again. -kb
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] (no subject)
- Index(es):