BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:06:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: <6632cf71d55dabb34806494b44349729.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <6632cf71d55dabb34806494b44349729.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
Rich Braun wrote: > My goal is simple: mash the power button or yank the network cable from > either of these machines, and have all the apps still running. Then plug the > machine back in and have all state restored to full redundancy without having > to type any commands. > > For me, the use-case for HA technology really isn't just about designing > around failure. The more-important thing for me as a weekend-hobbyist user is > being able to take something down, mess with it/upgrade it/overhaul it for a > few hours or days, and put it back online without disrupting anything else. I'm also very interested n the topic of micro clusters for home use. I'd like to see this topic explored further here or elsewhere. It would be great if Ken and others planning to build such systems shared their proposed designs, and reported back on how well each aspect worked. As I suggested in the other posting on the packaging of applications, it would similarly be nice to see a turn-key distribution of OpenStack that is aimed at the micro cluster market. If I recall correctly from Federico's earlier talk on OpenStack (http://blu.org/cgi-bin/calendar/2013-aug), OpenStack may be ill suited to a micro cluster. He ended up with, I think, a 9-node cluster, which he felt was the minimum viable configuration. > Is HA a dead technology? Obviously not. It's more active than ever. > What am I missing? Did the commercial cloud services co-opt all > development and horde this technology for their own overpriced business > models? Yes, I believe so. It depends on what layer you are looking at. There are several open source solutions for creating private clouds, with OpenStack being the one most talked about these days. There are several clustering file systems in use in production. You mentioned GlusterFS, and there is also Ceph (http://ceph.newdream.net/, part of OpenStack), and others. Lots has happened on the web side of things. Lots of off-the-shelf, open source technologies to address that. I think much of the reset ends up being carefully developed in-house configurations that haven't been shared back with the community. But I'm mostly speculating based on what I've read. This is outside my areas of expertise. -Tom -- Tom Metro The Perl Shop, Newton, MA, USA "Predictable On-demand Perl Consulting." http://www.theperlshop.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] easy clustering of applications
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] easy clustering of applications
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):