BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Dropbox
- Subject: [Discuss] Dropbox
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 20:29:49 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5352F96F.8080500@gmail.com>
- References: <CAL8cYW1fEhj-reUNptW4+vfU5nywX-OB0=PCKUOQE_Vt1qCD=A@mail.gmail.com> <5352BED2.7020908@gmail.com> <5352E966.5020102@gmail.com> <5352F96F.8080500@gmail.com>
Richard Pieri wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> If the encryption is done properly, and can be verified, it doesn't >> matter where your bits are stored. > > Well, yes, actually, it does. Dropbox for example does the encryption > properly but they can and do hand over the keys to law enforcement upon > request. As Bill pointed out, from a crypto-perspective, that they have the ability to hand over your keys means that they fit the very definition of using a weak crypto model. Dropbox prioritizes convenience over privacy. They is very clear business and financial reasons why they have their system designed the way it is. It makes for a low cost, easy to support, user friendly service. I wouldn't recommend using it for anything, except documents you wouldn't mind sharing publicly, or as storage for client-side encrypted blobs. Google Docs is in the same league. -Tom -- Tom Metro The Perl Shop, Newton, MA, USA "Predictable On-demand Perl Consulting." http://www.theperlshop.com/
- References:
- [Discuss] Ubuntu One file services
- From: genuineaudio at gmail.com (Stuart Conner)
- [Discuss] Ubuntu One file services
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] AeroFS
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] AeroFS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Ubuntu One file services
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] AeroFS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] AeroFS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] the problem with centralized certificate authorities
- Next by thread: [Discuss] AeroFS
- Index(es):