BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 20:25:16 -0400
- References: <536A9B83.5030601@blu.org>
On May 7, 2014, Jerry Feldman wrote: >So, if you had to buy a new 1TB drive and you had a choice between a >high quality consumer SSD and a mechanical drive... [qualifier about "same price" omitted] No contest! (At least for my purposes.) Here's the result of running "du -shx" on a 3TB Western Digital Red and a 1TB Crucible consumer SSD with about the same number & size of files on them. After clearing the disk caches, of course. Western Digital HD: 46 seconds Crucible SSD: 8 seconds Yeah, it's just one read test, and the WD Red probably isn't the ultimate drive, but in practice the SSD speed is great. (I run two SSDs in RAID 1 as my primary work drive.) My VMs feel faster on the SSD too. YMMV. -- Dan Barrett dbarrett at blazemonger.com
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):