BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Subject: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 09:11:41 -0400
- In-reply-to: <536B80EC.2080005@borg.org>
- References: <536AF0F7.80707@gmail.com> <536B80EC.2080005@borg.org>
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:04:44AM -0400, Kent Borg wrote: > Here is why I ask: I am just shifting things over to a new 16GB > machine. I got that much because I could and it was pretty cheap. > But I don't know what I am going to do with all that. That is a > *bleep* of a lot of RAM. I'm building a new machine for my father. I'm putting in 16GB of RAM because: a: it's cheap enough b: that's all it will take (Gigabyte BX micromachine) c: I won't have to upgrade it again d: everything goes faster when it doesn't have to wait for the disk But it always gets down to (d). Why do database servers like RAM? So that they don't have to go to disk so often. Why do VM servers like RAM? How about Firefox and Chrome and the 3D spinny desktop thing? -dsr-
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- References:
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Next by Date: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Next by thread: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Index(es):