[Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance

[richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)]

F. O. Ozbek wrote:
> We have tested ceph, glusterfs and moosefs and decided to use moosefs.

Be careful with MooseFS. Last I knew it ignores fsync and O_SYNC. I call
that a deal breaker for anything other than scratch storage. See
previous commentary about SSDs that ignore fsync/O_SYNC and the
associated data loss issues.

-- 
Rich P.