BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Subject: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:05:48 -0500
- In-reply-to: <53776565.9010706@gmail.com>
- References: <49ef9e53017b42958b2c16e83c5668dc@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <53762E66.8010204@horne.net> <53763247.6010402@gmail.com> <53764235.5040904@horne.net> <53764C64.4070308@gmail.com> <5377494B.50902@blu.org> <53775E31.9010005@gmail.com> <537761DF.7060206@blu.org> <53776565.9010706@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:34:29AM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: > > Yes it is. We host thousands of members on our listservs, and many of > > them use email clients that do not have the capability of selecting on > > list-id. > > Like I said, this is not your problem. Nor is it your responsibility to > break mail handling standards to cater to broken MUAs. For once, I actually agree with everything you said here. :) I hate the subject line munging because it adds a bunch of useless info to the beginning of the subject line, making it harder to see the actual metadata that makes it worth having a subject line in the first place. On a list like this it's not so bad, but it gets really bad when people cross-post to multiple lists, as happens at work more than I would prefer... BUT... Last I knew a couple of very popular MUAs couldn't filter on anything reasonable, and many of the users of such MUAs don't have a choice what they run because it's dictated by their employer/spouse/etc. so for those people it's the only recourse. Sometimes, you have to make sacrifices for the greater good, even if you are technically "in the right" (so to speak). -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- References:
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Index(es):