BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Subject: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:26:52 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20140522172630.GB8020@dragontoe.org> (Derek Martin's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 12:26:30 -0500")
- References: <53754F74.4000703@gmail.com> <20140519195327.GE3797@dragontoe.org> <537A7274.7080705@gmail.com> <20140521172852.GG3797@dragontoe.org> <537CEC28.3060704@gmail.com> <20140521185146.GH3797@dragontoe.org> <537CFD95.7060306@gmail.com> <20140521205815.GA5683@dragontoe.org> <537D2ED1.7070109@gmail.com> <20140522170512.GB5683@dragontoe.org> <20140522172630.GB8020@dragontoe.org>
Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> writes: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:05:12PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:55:13PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: >> > With the caveat that I did not list Mutt by name but that's quibbling. >> > Point is, as you've experienced yourself, Mutt's behavior is not >> > consistent when improperly-set Reply-To fields are in play. >> >> I admit I'd forgotten this; for the longest time I had a patch which I >> wrote to fix this applied to my mutt; Mutt dev being what it is >> (basically dead) the maintainers didn't have any interest in applying >> it. I have no use to maintain patches forever so I stopped bothering. > > I meant to also comment that with list-reply functionality, it's > (currently) largely a non-issue since reply-to is rarely set by anyone > except for some mailing lists which still think this is a good idea, > of which I am currently subscribed to zero. you are subscribed to this list... which just had a reply-to set to reply back to the list... -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- References:
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] (ot) Android
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Index(es):