BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Subject: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:49:18 +0000
- In-reply-to: <53886781.5010107@blu.org>
- References: <217800c70e2414f199ab891a6d6db058.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <5387A861.5070708@gmail.com> <5387CAA6.3010905@gmail.com> <53886781.5010107@blu.org>
I have a new speculation: They were told to remove the hidden volume capability. They would rather commit suicide. They were told not to go public with the coercion attempt as lavabit did. So they posted ridiculous bullshit on their webpage, signed it to demonstrate it's legitimately them, and the public is left to speculate what happened. If it were really a hoax, they would surely have straightened it out by now.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- References:
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Index(es):