BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Subject: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:53:59 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAPiok-p_jq=Ej2DwPCC2vRm2geJW27ma8-RmFGRMUu5KN-cTWw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJFsZ=oqFAXiicbUBo1CyaWOCkqW62DK=+7NRGUyQpSdjoagqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPiok-p_jq=Ej2DwPCC2vRm2geJW27ma8-RmFGRMUu5KN-cTWw@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/23/2014 1:18 PM, John Hall wrote: > I wonder... What sort of write performance folks get from NTFS drives > attached to a gigabit router? Has anyone ever successfully connected a disk drive to router? But seriously, I typically get 70-80MB/s between nodes over GigE with 1500 byte frames. Consumer disks are the bottleneck, not the network. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: johnhall2.0 at gmail.com (John Hall)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] rack mountable chassis
- Next by Date: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Index(es):
