BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:22:02 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAPN2fFLk-uAP=zLD6rGxV3--Aa3i-zWWbV9U6YMtktTcP86zBg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <5479FEA1.5000504@gmail.com> <547A062F.8080906@horne.net> <CAMdng5ubKrUXTKGOay4-WZDGoA-vL7LQUC5vuWDWbOGobKYNdQ@mail.gmail.com> <547A0AC8.5090302@gmail.com> <CAPN2fFLk-uAP=zLD6rGxV3--Aa3i-zWWbV9U6YMtktTcP86zBg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/29/2014 1:27 PM, Betsy Schwartz wrote: > The suit explanation has to focus on business impact, not technical details. > > use phrases like: > "risk of disruption" "proven compatibility" "increased stability" > "total uptime" "maintenance cost" > > (or their inverses) Betsy, Thanks, that's a good point. Of course, I could try to explain the reason OS's get forked, but anything I say to suits has to be an "elevator speech" that takes no more than 30 seconds. Bill -- E. William Horne 339-364-8487
- References:
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- From: betsys at gmail.com (Betsy Schwartz)
- [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Debian officially forked over systemd
- Index(es):