BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] DNSSEC
- Subject: [Discuss] DNSSEC
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:12:10 +0000
- In-reply-to: <BN3PR0401MB1204647CA6E7523747D3077FDC670@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <BN3PR0401MB1204647CA6E7523747D3077FDC670@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In short, the question is: What is the behavior of an old dns caching server, when it receives a client query for record types that it is too old to understand? Is it able to dumbly relay that query upstream, and dumbly relay the response back? The answer to this question essentially determines whether or not DNSSEC is broken.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] DNSSEC
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] DNSSEC
- References:
- [Discuss] DNSSEC
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] DNSSEC
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DNSSEC
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DNSSEC
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] DNSSEC
- Next by thread: [Discuss] DNSSEC
- Index(es):
